Server Check
- Thread starter Basti
- Start date
Please pm me the servers ip and query port ( QUERY PORT is needed to gather server info directly from a game server. )
So possible errors here.
1) you use a wrong query port
2) you use no query port ( then default game query port is used ) but the server is setup under a different port
3) the member submitted wrong port
So you/the member actually need to know their query port
So possible errors here.
1) you use a wrong query port
2) you use no query port ( then default game query port is used ) but the server is setup under a different port
3) the member submitted wrong port
So you/the member actually need to know their query port
Morus
www.votezone.eu , www.privateserversranking.com
I'm testing it on the servers taken from here: http://www.theminelist.com/ it is visiolist 
for a test I added this server: http://magicacraft.net/
As you can see the IP is: play.magicacraft.net (199.83.49.248) I used http://ip-lookup.net/domain-lookup.php to find out the IP address.
Port 25567
I changed the files back to allow only IP. I have the other file ready. Just want to make sure it is working on IP first then I will add the host usage as well.
for a test I added this server: http://magicacraft.net/
As you can see the IP is: play.magicacraft.net (199.83.49.248) I used http://ip-lookup.net/domain-lookup.php to find out the IP address.
Port 25567
I changed the files back to allow only IP. I have the other file ready. Just want to make sure it is working on IP first then I will add the host usage as well.
no need, ill play around a bit, still have your ftp. Have seen that the issue is that no query port is appended to the connection instead of using the default.
Most likely due a issue from join, normally if query port left plank it should submit the default one, which havent happened with your member
Most likely due a issue from join, normally if query port left plank it should submit the default one, which havent happened with your member
If you use this plugin and updated to VisioList 0.9 it is required to reupload this plugin ( dont delete, just reupload ). This is because of the change on the statistics page.
Additionally, game library have been updated and 2 new games added. Next release will get a better and more usuable admin interfere.
Additionally, game library have been updated and 2 new games added. Next release will get a better and more usuable admin interfere.
Harris Marfel
Top 100 Online Gaming
can you make this plugin support with game list bellow:
Perfect World (Using Port 29000)
Forsaken World (Not sure what port to use)
Jade Dinasty (Not Sure what port to use)
WOW
sory,,,, to much request
Perfect World (Using Port 29000)
Forsaken World (Not sure what port to use)
Jade Dinasty (Not Sure what port to use)
WOW
sory,,,, to much request
Will add them to the list. Ill try to figure out which status listener is used on them and will add them if possible. But some games cant be queried. Not sure out of the head but i think WOW is not possible.
Cant give you a date though, most likely after vl 1.0 release, as the plugin will move from admin settings to the categories page to make "add game to category" process easier and more understandable
Cant give you a date though, most likely after vl 1.0 release, as the plugin will move from admin settings to the categories page to make "add game to category" process easier and more understandable
De minecraft protocol is written from : https://github.com/xPaw/PHP-Minecraft-Query
This code support a few other options, but can i use this, and if yes HOW!
Because in HTML isn't posible to use PHP
This code support a few other options, but can i use this, and if yes HOW!
Because in HTML isn't posible to use PHP
That page has nothing to do with this project, nor does the default php work with visiolist if you simply upload the code files. All has to go into a plugin ( php code ) and make it work with visiolist.
On top of that its a different class and this minecraft protocol was not based on that, its simply a thank you message.
I have enough issues coding with this one and dont start a second plugin for just 1 game, sorry.
On top of that its a different class and this minecraft protocol was not based on that, its simply a thank you message.
I have enough issues coding with this one and dont start a second plugin for just 1 game, sorry.
It is doing that, but most likely the server havent configured it correctly, play.domain.com need to be linked with the server ip. In case on enjin for example you can do that in their dns management
But, like i said in the other threa, wait a few days, the minecraft plugin both have servercheck and votifier. So dont use this one, switching the plugins and keeping old data is a manual process which you should avoid if its a matter of a few days.
The new plugin is there in 1-2 days
But, like i said in the other threa, wait a few days, the minecraft plugin both have servercheck and votifier. So dont use this one, switching the plugins and keeping old data is a manual process which you should avoid if its a matter of a few days.
The new plugin is there in 1-2 days
mcservers
New Member
I'm definitely going to be using the new plugin but will users still have to put http:// before their server? That doesn't really make much sense to me or at least not for Minecraft. I have a script that queries the server and outputs it how I like but it operates like:
Code:
view.php?ip={$server_ip}&port={$port}
ip:port works fine
play.domain.com:port works fine
http://play.domain.com:port does not work.Its needed, to verify things on the join form. It will be stripped everywhere else again
Though that is something i noticed while making the the other plugin, so its not in this one. This one has quite a few mistakes which will be corrected when the other plugin makes it debut.
Ill pm you the other plugin, so you use that one instead of this one please. Servercheck in there was prooven to be working, votifier most likely works too, but cant guarantee that just yet.
Though that is something i noticed while making the the other plugin, so its not in this one. This one has quite a few mistakes which will be corrected when the other plugin makes it debut.
Ill pm you the other plugin, so you use that one instead of this one please. Servercheck in there was prooven to be working, votifier most likely works too, but cant guarantee that just yet.